Well,
I thought I had missed the lesson. Immediately after opening to the short story The Lesson, I recognized the story. At some point during
high school, I had read the short by Toni Bambara. I couldn’t tell you what I
thought of it then, but I remember thinking I had missed the lesson. I can’t
recall analyzing the story and definitely cannot recall the symbolism. Additionally, I couldn’t remember it being
particularly funny. Thinking that I would “get it” this time, I read the story
again. While I got more out of the story, I did not find myself laughing
through it. I continually questioned which parts were meant to be humorous. In
my eyes, Sylvia is a tough, young girl from a tough neighborhood. She lives in
close quarters with her extended family in neighboring apartments. The
apartments are described in bad condition with drunks roaming the hallways. I
wasn’t sure where the humor was coming into play. Was I meant to find the
living conditions funny? Because I didn’t; I felt bad for the children living
there. They had to live with filth and play around it. The kids were taught by
another woman because Aunt Gretchen wasn’t bright enough to teach. The parents
were thankful to have someone else around to teach the children. Ms. Moore, a
college educated woman, took on the role of teaching several of the
neighborhood boys and girls. But, Sylvia doesn’t care much for her teacher. In
fact, she calls her teacher a range of names I can’t imagine saying at that
age. Sylvia even said we "laughed at her, laughed the way we did at the
junk man who went about his business like he was some big-time president and
his sorry-ass horse his secretary." Was this meant to be funny? Was I
supposed to be laughing at her judgment? I wasn’t laughing. Later, Miss
Moore takes the kids to F.A.O. Schwartz. With each toy the children look at,
Miss Moore asks a question. It seemed like she was pushing their education,
asking questions to encourage thought. Although, by showing the students
expensive toys, Miss Moore was able to direct the kids to question a society
that provides expensive toys to the more fortunate. She also caused Sylvia to
feel ashamed. I don’t think her goal was to shame Sylvia, but I don’t know if
she felt badly. I felt she was trying to show a side of society she didn’t
agree with. She doesn’t think the kids should be ashamed and she doesn’t agree
with the distribution of wealth. But, when Miss Moore is trying to drive her
point home, Sylvia just turns away. She walks away and Sugar runs to catch up
with her. At this point, my questioning comes full circle. Did I “get” the
story? I thought I had until Sylvia ran away. Sylvia concludes by saying, “ain’t
nobody gonna beat me at nuthin.” I feel like I missed the point. I am not sure
if she meant Miss Moore, life, money, hardship, or something else. I really don’t
know if I understood Bambara’s lesson, but either way, I was not laughing my
way through.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Pages - Menu
Blog Archive
Why Am I Blogging
I am blogging for my Literature and Civilization II class at Texas Christian University. Through this course, we are analyzing humor and what is funny? This blog is a way to document reflections on the readings and meeting with our conversation partners. If you are curious to follow others, my professor's blog is listed below.
No comments:
Post a Comment