As we continue reading Tales of Juha, this book has
become one of my favorite books we have read. This time we read “Social Satire,”
“Cunning and Resource,” and “Naïveté and Stupidity.” I enjoyed each of the sections
but my favorite would be the last section, “Naïveté and Stupidity.” In this
section, Juha is portrayed as someone who is naïve and not on the bright side. While
he is not the butt of the jokes, he provides someone to laugh at. His thoughts
are silly, adolescent, and laughable. He seems very sincere in some of the anecdotes.
I think this section is in great contrast with the first section of “Wit and
Wisdom.” The difference portrays the essence of Juha. He is a diverse character
who represents a range of stereotypes.
A few
common ideas/themes appeared in several anecdotes. For example, one of my
favorite stories from last time involved the “Race Winner.” In the anecdote,
Juha and his wife have been married for three months. At this point, his wife
is ready to give birth to a baby. In the first section (“Wit and Wisdom”), Juha
is on the snarky side. He plainly lies out that something isn’t right. The baby
did what most babies do in nine months in three months. Juha jokingly wants to
name the baby “Race Winner.” But, a different picture is painted in the section
“Naïveté and Stupidity.” Here, Juha is puzzled at the situation. He asks “what
is going on here?” He knows that women carry a child for nine months. But, when
he begins to question his wife, he falls into the not as brilliant stereotype.
Contrary to the previous Juha, Juha is easily influenced by his wife. Instead
of being witty and turning the table, the table is turned on him. Somehow, Juha
is convinced three months to each the mother, father, and baby totals to nine
months. I thought the stories alone were funny, but the way they compared added
to the humor. I experienced a cognitive shift during the second one because I
expected it to follow the same line. I experienced the same thing with another
story involving donkeys. Juha is riding on a donkey along with a number of
other donkeys. He counts the donkeys but always forgets the one he is. Continuously
causing conflicts with himself, he gets on and off the donkeys. I thought it
was interesting to see the straight comparison between two folk tales. The
anecdotes had the basic theme but a different way of telling the story. I’m
curious to see if there will be more similarities like these throughout the
book. Also, I’ll be able to share some more stories with Hashim!